Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts

Review: Up

Written by Matt on Monday, June 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM



Why is it that Disney-Pixar is able to make every summer just that much better with their nearly-annual feature films and shorts? With the exception of Cars, I have never seen a Pixar film that I didn't enjoy, starting where the magic began with Toy Story as a child in 1995.

On Saturday night I went to see Up in Disney Digital 3D and I have to say... Bravo. First let me get the 3D stuff out of the way so I can actually get into discussing the film. Obviously this was a film made for 2D viewing adapted for 3D, not the other way around, so there wasn't really anything overwhelming about objects jumping out at you--actually I can only think of one instance where this happened. Still, while it was an extra 3 bucks per ticket, it was actually worth it because it really enhanced the standard 2D visuals to a point where you would really have to pay attention to notice the difference, but when you focused on it, it was a huge benefit.

I don't want to get into too many details about the story line because I've really noticed traffic picking up on the blog lately and I don't wanna give away any real spoilers, but I'll give a basic overview.

The movie follows the life of Carl Fredickson (Edward Asner) from a child and his love of adventure thanks to his hero Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer), but we soon find out that while Carl thinks he wants to be adventurous, his lack of athleticism and just flat out fear of so many elementary things prevents him from doing anything extreme. He soon meets a young girl named Ellie who is also a fan of Muntz and seeks adventure, except she actually partakes in seizing the day rather than dreaming about it. As the cliche moves on, they eventually get married and both promise to each other that they will one day travel to Paradise Falls in South America (Where Muntz once took his infamous expedition), but for the time being Ellie works with exotic birds in the local zoo while Carl owns a balloon stand. Sadly, and as expected by Disney, Ellie gets ill and passes away which turns Carl into a grumpy recluse, gets forced to move to a retirement home, but instead inflates a 1,000 balloons with helium and makes his house fly all the way to South America with hopes of finding Paradise Falls. That's all I'm going to say about the story right now, but there's your basic outline.

I don't know what it was about this film, but you just couldn't help but smile and enjoy the entire thing. I mean it had everything from romance to adventure to comedy to a great overall message. It was just amazingly fun.

Two things I really enjoyed about Up was both the voice acting and how dynamic the character of Carl was.

With the voice acting, I wanna give a shout out to young Jordan Nagai who did the voice of Russell (the fat kid in the previews). According to IMDB, this is the first film Nagai has ever worked on, but with how well he plays his character, you wouldn't believe that he's new to the business. He does a great job of mixing naivety with both humor and love. All of his lines are perfectly written AND carried out.

Then of course you have the lead role with Carl who, like I said earlier, is voiced by Edward Asner. Throughout the entire film he has such "generic" one-liners that make you think of a stereotypical grumpy old man, but they're simply hilarious. But that's what Asner does, in my opinion he's the best voice actor of all time. He doesn't do a lot of live-action, but that's OK, because we still recognize his voice when we hear it on television or in film.

This also helps add to how dynamic Carl's character was and Disney needed a veteran voice actor to pull this off. Now the way he changes was expected from the audience, but at the same time there was never a part of the film where Carl's character upset us, he's just lovable guy even when he is miserable His main change is him going from smart-ass recluse (not so much unlike myself) to a man who loves everyone and just likes being with people--a way of life he never imagined he'd enjoy.

Something else that I really enjoyed was the cinematography, which is something a lot of people don't give enough credit to in animated films. It's really hard to explain what I mean, but if you go see Up, definitely pay attention to shot angles, especially the wide ones.

The thing that is going to make me give this film 5 movie reels versus 4.5 is the fact that writer / director Pete Doctor is OBVIOUSLY a fan of science fiction and he worked three Star Wars references into Up. The two main references were during one scene where the dogs started piloting their air planes in attempt to shoot down Carl's house. When they begin to commence their attack the dogs use the lines "Red Leader, checking in," "Red Two checking in," "Red three, checking in," which as anyone should know is the opening dialogue to the Trench Run scene in A New Hope. I was the only one in the entire theater who laughed at that, but I literally fell out of my seat I was cracking up so hard. The next came at the end of the same scene when the dogs crash their planes... While they're all 3 flying in a V formation, two crash into each other while the third gets nicked and is sent spinning out into "space," which was obviously taken from the end of the Trench Run when Han comes back to clear Luke so he can fire the torpedo's into the Death Star, sending Vader's tie flying out of control. All of these references are pretty much confirmed at the end of the film when Carl and Russell have their picture taken outside of a movie theater showing Star Wars.

In the end what I really enjoyed was meaning of Up. Obviously "adventure" was a theme throughout, but with that version of adventure we think of the outdoors and big, exciting, events, but that was just the theme of the film, not the the meaning. The real message was that life is not only an adventure, life is the true adventure. Not the safaris or scuba diving trips, but the little things that make life the amazing thing that it is.

Rating: 5/5

Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian

Written by Matt on Monday, May 25, 2009 at 11:53 AM

So I figured I'd go ahead. and start my first film review this morning. Last night my girlfriend and I felt like going to see a movie and could not decide between Angels and Demons or the latest installment of Night at the Museum, but due to what time they were showing, we went with this summer's main family comedy. I'll be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this film, but it was one that I was wanting to see due to the fact that I enjoyed the first one when I went with my family back in 2006. They were both directed by Shawn Levy, both written by Robert Garant and Thomas Lennon and both films starred the same base cast, but for some reason Battle of the Smithsonian just didn't make me chuckle like Night at the Museum did and I would like to take a few minutes and dissect why that may be.


TIMEOUT: No, I did not think that the original Night at the Museum was some over-the-top funny film, I simply thought it was a great FAMILY COMEDY and got a good laugh out of it with my two younger sisters. Having said that, I will continue.


Something that first irritated me about Battle of the Smithsonian was the way the opening was setup. Yes, I understand that it is a sequel and in order to have a good sequel, you often need a decent amount of reference to the prequel, but let's remind ourselves here that this is a FAMILY COMEDY. Battle of the Smithsonian had way too many references to Night at the Museum, too many to the point that you really needed to see the original before understanding the second installment. For something like the Star Wars or Star Trek trilogies, things that are epic and have a cult-following, yes, these movies are in a series with a dedicated story line, see the A New Hope before you see Empire Strikes Back! Go watch the Wrath of Khan before you seen The Search for Spock! Yes, I get that, but for a family film, why make that an issues? No one has to see the prequels before they see Shrek 2 or 3 (The Third). While I may be going over the top here and acting like Battle of the Smithsonian couldn't be understood without seeing Night at the Museum, I apologize, it's not exactly the case, but it still does have that feeling that Levy and company wanted it that way.

Since we have that out of the way, what I really want to say is that this movie just wasn't funny. I'm sorry, but it wasn't, which is sad with such a great comedic cast. Ben Stiller didn't make me laugh, Owen Wilson was bland, Christopher Guest was decent at best, and the man I was expecting the most from was Hank Azaria, really just had one scene where he made me laugh, but I will tell ya, I laughed hard. Still, overall, I just didn't laugh very often last night.

Now give credit to Azaria on playing his main character, Kamunruh, as well as the voices of "The Thinker" and Abraham Lincoln, but Azaria usually always makes me laugh, but here he was just... vanilla?

Anyone who saw the original Night at the Museum would agree that while Ricky Gervais might have had only a small role as Dr. McPhee, his dialogue made audiences laugh their asses off. So naturally I expected him to do the same in Battle of the Smithsonian, but no, it was more vanilla than anything else. AND I LOVE THE COMEDY OF RICKY GERVAIS! Yes, that's how bad his lines were.

The attempted love affair between Ben Stiller and Amy Adams (Amelia Earhart) was just atrocious and unexpected. Now I'm thankful that there wasn't a spin at the end where the two end up being together just at night when Earhart comes to life, but even trying to add it in there was an obvious stretch that failed miserably and some of that could have been partially due Adams overacting job. Personally, I see Adams as a talented and versatile actress, but while playing Amelia Earhart she was just too over the top, forcing lines of awkward dialogue that were meant to stress what time period the came from, but it was just too overbearing.

Another thing that got to me was how the museum exhibits defied the rules of the original film, about how they cannot stray too far away from the tablet or else they'll freeze and go back to their "natural" state. Here we have not only the entire Smithsonian district coming to life, but the National Mall becoming animated as well whether the tablet had close proximity or not.

Yes, I realize that I should take the same attitude to a family movie like I do to a sci-fi flick where you just can't over think it and accept things the way they are, but the tablet thing along with the fact that Earhart was able to fit virtually all the exhibits of the American Museum of Natural History in the cargo hold of her Lockheed Electra was beyond me.

Yes, I realize all of this has been very vague, but there was just so much in this film that really disappointed me that I can't go into too much detail on it.

Unless you child or little sister is begging you to take them to see Battle of the Smithsonian, do yourself a favor and avoid it.

I give it a 2 / 5

The very first post

Written by Matt on Sunday, May 24, 2009 at 4:38 PM


What's up. Welcome to my new home on the Internet to review the latest in video games, film and television. Now you might be asking why the hell would you care about what I have to say and the truth is I have no good reason... This is just another in a long line of blogs on the web dedicated to one person's opinion in the latest in "pop culture" (I hate that term). But look, you're already here, why not look around a bit and see if there's anything you like or dislike that you can make fun for me for.

Now before we go any further, I would like to state that I am not a "video game rager." I'm not good at going off at inanimate objects, I'm good at going off at people every once in a while, but not at video games; I leave that to the "god of raging," Mr. James Rolfe (AKA the Angry Video Game Nerd). Now don't get me wrong, sometimes I will get heated on a subject, but I won't dedicate any reviews to how sucky something is unless it is a genuine piece of shit.

Right now I am still editing a bunch of BS code for this Blogger page, but stick with me as I hope to have it all ironed out soon.

So just sit back, relax, and let the reviews begin.

About the author

This is the area where you will put in information about who you are, your experience blogging, and what your blog is about. You aren't limited, however, to just putting a biography. You can put whatever you please.