How to get a wireless Xbox Live connection via your PC

Written by Matt on Friday, June 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM

Simulposted from my Denver Xbox Examiner page. If you enjoyed this, be a pal (not PAL) and click on that link.

I know this isn't anything ground breaking, but it's nice to save money in this economy. Many of you have no need for this, but I thought I'd at least share.
----------------------



So since I've moved into my new house I have been without Xbox Live for two weeks because I accidentally left my wireless Xbox receiver back home in Tulsa, Okla. When I visited the folks following finals week. Now I'm back in Colorado and before last night I was without Live because I didn't feel like spending $100 on a new receiver designed specifically for my Xbox 360 console, I decided to turn my desktop into a wireless receiver itself. I know it's a tough economy out there right now and we all could afford to save a few bucks so I thought I would share this with everyone else. I realize it's not a groundbreaking technique and I'm sure there are other how to's out there to show you this, but I'm just here to help. Wanna know how? Read below.

(I'm using Vista in this tutorial, but you can do the same thing with XP)

Here's what you need:

Xbox 360 console
Two (2) CAT 5 Cables (Ethernet)
Hub / Switch
Computer with wireless access (doesn't matter whether or not it's a desktop or laptop, just as long as it receives Internet via a wireless signal).

Step 1: Connect the Ethernet cable from your PC to the first slot in your hub.
Step 2: Connect the Ethernet cable from your Xbox 360 to the second slot in your hub.
NOTE: Do NOT plug either cable to uplink slot. The point here is to “fuse” the two connections together to act as one.

Step 3: Open your Network and Sharing Center (Start > Control Panel (Classic View) > Network and Sharing Center. Once there, click “Manage Network Connections”



Step 4: Hold control and click both Local Area Network and your wireless network connection. Release the control key and right click on either of the selected networks then left click on “Bridge Connections.”

After a few seconds your window should look like this:



Step 5: Go to Start > Run (or hold the keys windows+R) and in the window type “cmd” (without the quotes).

Step 7: Once the DOS command prompt comes up type “netsh bridge show adapter “ (obviously, from here on out don't put the quotes in your prompt)

Step 7: In the same command prompt window type “netsh bridge set adapter 1 enable” (if you happened to mix up steps 1 and 2, then the command to type would be “netsh bridge set adapter 2 enable”)

Step 8: Once again type “netsh bridge show adapter” in the command prompt just to make sure it worked correctly. If it did, you should see something like this (notice the adapter you set to “enable” has changed from the “disabled” state:



Step 9: ENJOY!

First Thoughts: Project Natal

Written by Matt on Monday, June 8, 2009 at 5:49 PM


As the newly appointed Denver Xbox Examiner, what credibility would I have if I didn’t mention Microsoft’s biggest announcement of E3 2009, Project Natal?

If you haven’t heard, Project Natal is the new motion sensor technology that Xbox 360 is testing out for their next wave of gaming much like Nintendo’s Wii, only that Project Natal uses no controller whatsoever. That’s right, rather than being required to hold a wand and a nunchuck, this version of motion sensor gaming is completely hands free... well, other than your actual hands.

This concept of gaming raises a lot of questions, much like Wii did when it was first launched, the main one: will it work? And not just work, work in the way it was intended to. The Wii was able to successfully prove doubters wrong, but this, in my opinion, is a whole other frontier.

What I see Project Natal, which Microsoft used Steven Spielberg as their E3 spokesperson, as is an attempt to bring those newly hooked gamers that were reeled in the Wii’s ease of use (such as dad and grandma)–it’s a bridge builder. For moderate to serious gamers such as myself I see this as a possible step back for Microsoft’s main consumers. We like having that controller in our hand allows us different combinations of attacks, flight maneuvers and other movements... not training our bodies new ways to move. We don’t want the Power Glove 2.0.!

On the other side of this argument lies a brilliant idea from Microsoft that will almost guarantee a huge spike in sales because it’s a supplement for a new system that will probably cost, roughly, $200, rather than sprouting $500 for a whole new console... let’s just attach an add-on!

Not only does this allow for saving money in an economy that we’re still waiting to come back to surface, but it brings those gamers who got hooked on the Wii over from Nintendo to Microsoft with a product that promises to be easier than easy. At the same time, we’re able connect our standard Xbox 360 controllers and play [enter name of a groundbreaking shooter here], while our families can play “pop the bubbles” when we’re not around.

Honestly, when I stared this post I was really skeptic about Project Natal, but the more I dissected my thoughts on paper (or the computer screen), I realized that this might not be so bad afterall.

What if Super Smash Bros. was on Xbox?

Written by Matt on Friday, June 5, 2009 at 9:03 PM


So earlier today I was playing Super Smash Bros. And Super Smash Bros. Melee and I thought to myself? If there were a version of this game dedicated to original Microsoft characters on the Xbox and Xbox 360, who would it feature? I thought about this for a while and the truth is, there aren't too many exclusive Xbox characters out there (and by exclusive I really mean ORINALLY on Xbox before moving to other platforms).

The Super Smash Bros. Series is so great because it brings all of these characters that we've loved since childhood and puts them in a single game. Sure, the newer versions of the game bring in guys like Snake and Sonic the Hedgehog. It's a simple concept turned into a best seller, and you have to know that Nintendo knew that no one could pull this off quite like they could... Sony could have a decent list with Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Chris Redfield, Jill Valentine, Croc, etc., but Microsoft can quite put a group together for one main reason, they're too young and focus less on being original and more on groundbreaking system performance. Don't get me wrong, I love my Xbox 360 and will probably never own a Playstation console because I am brand loyal to everyone other than Sony, but you have to admit that Microsoft has that problem.

Still, I am going to try to put a list together and you can fill in what I might be missing.

  • Master Chief
  • Cortana
  • Generic Fable Hero
  • The Arbiter
  • Vertical Tank (from Steel Battallion)
  • Hawk
  • Sam Fisher
  • Kelly O'Lenmey
  • Zak (Fuzion Frenzy)
  • Marcus Fenix

Thoughts?

List of systems that I own

Written by Matt on Thursday, June 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Sorry I haven't updated a couple of days and my apologies for this filler-post, but I am really trying to get my point-and-shoot photo journal done for my JTC211 summer class I am taking (you can view the progress here). So for now I'll just run off a list of video game systems that I own so that you can get to know me a little better:

Xbox 360
Xbox
Wii
Gamecube
Nintendo 64
Super Nintendo
Sega Genesis
Nintendo Entertainment System
NES (Top Loader)
Gameboy Color
Game Boy
Atari 7800

E3's latest "The Old Republic" trailer has me worried

Written by Matt on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM


Maybe it's just because I am obsessing way too hard over this game's release since I love Star Wars so much, but am I the only one who is worried about the the latest Star Wars: The Old Republic trailer that was released today at E3? Don't get me wrong, it looks AMAZING, but the amount of detail and the high-quality graphics was what really started to make me think.

Normally, yes, for any current generation PC or console game I really enjoy stunning visuals, but this is an MMO--not something I'm gonna run solely off my computer.

I'm no genius, but I'm also not a dumb ass. I realize that this was a pre-rendered sequence, not actual gameplay footage, but still I started to worry. I am very excited about this game's release and the fact that Bioware is incorporating story into an MMO, but with the downfall of Star Wars: Galaxies, I want this game to have a high population of players and if there is too much stress on graphics then it limits the number of consumers who can successfully play the game. This isn't Crysis, it's an MMO. While I'm sure I could run it fine, I'm not so certain about my friends.

Whether you love it or hate it, you have to admit that World of Warcraft has done a great job with keeping the visuals pretty low-key so that anyone with a credit card and Internet access can play, which is part of the reason it is so successful. Again, don't get me wrong, I hope the visuals of The Old Republic are way better than WoW, but at the same time I don't want anything overdone where server speeds drag so low that I can't slay a Dewback for entertainment.

Review: Up

Written by Matt on Monday, June 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM



Why is it that Disney-Pixar is able to make every summer just that much better with their nearly-annual feature films and shorts? With the exception of Cars, I have never seen a Pixar film that I didn't enjoy, starting where the magic began with Toy Story as a child in 1995.

On Saturday night I went to see Up in Disney Digital 3D and I have to say... Bravo. First let me get the 3D stuff out of the way so I can actually get into discussing the film. Obviously this was a film made for 2D viewing adapted for 3D, not the other way around, so there wasn't really anything overwhelming about objects jumping out at you--actually I can only think of one instance where this happened. Still, while it was an extra 3 bucks per ticket, it was actually worth it because it really enhanced the standard 2D visuals to a point where you would really have to pay attention to notice the difference, but when you focused on it, it was a huge benefit.

I don't want to get into too many details about the story line because I've really noticed traffic picking up on the blog lately and I don't wanna give away any real spoilers, but I'll give a basic overview.

The movie follows the life of Carl Fredickson (Edward Asner) from a child and his love of adventure thanks to his hero Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer), but we soon find out that while Carl thinks he wants to be adventurous, his lack of athleticism and just flat out fear of so many elementary things prevents him from doing anything extreme. He soon meets a young girl named Ellie who is also a fan of Muntz and seeks adventure, except she actually partakes in seizing the day rather than dreaming about it. As the cliche moves on, they eventually get married and both promise to each other that they will one day travel to Paradise Falls in South America (Where Muntz once took his infamous expedition), but for the time being Ellie works with exotic birds in the local zoo while Carl owns a balloon stand. Sadly, and as expected by Disney, Ellie gets ill and passes away which turns Carl into a grumpy recluse, gets forced to move to a retirement home, but instead inflates a 1,000 balloons with helium and makes his house fly all the way to South America with hopes of finding Paradise Falls. That's all I'm going to say about the story right now, but there's your basic outline.

I don't know what it was about this film, but you just couldn't help but smile and enjoy the entire thing. I mean it had everything from romance to adventure to comedy to a great overall message. It was just amazingly fun.

Two things I really enjoyed about Up was both the voice acting and how dynamic the character of Carl was.

With the voice acting, I wanna give a shout out to young Jordan Nagai who did the voice of Russell (the fat kid in the previews). According to IMDB, this is the first film Nagai has ever worked on, but with how well he plays his character, you wouldn't believe that he's new to the business. He does a great job of mixing naivety with both humor and love. All of his lines are perfectly written AND carried out.

Then of course you have the lead role with Carl who, like I said earlier, is voiced by Edward Asner. Throughout the entire film he has such "generic" one-liners that make you think of a stereotypical grumpy old man, but they're simply hilarious. But that's what Asner does, in my opinion he's the best voice actor of all time. He doesn't do a lot of live-action, but that's OK, because we still recognize his voice when we hear it on television or in film.

This also helps add to how dynamic Carl's character was and Disney needed a veteran voice actor to pull this off. Now the way he changes was expected from the audience, but at the same time there was never a part of the film where Carl's character upset us, he's just lovable guy even when he is miserable His main change is him going from smart-ass recluse (not so much unlike myself) to a man who loves everyone and just likes being with people--a way of life he never imagined he'd enjoy.

Something else that I really enjoyed was the cinematography, which is something a lot of people don't give enough credit to in animated films. It's really hard to explain what I mean, but if you go see Up, definitely pay attention to shot angles, especially the wide ones.

The thing that is going to make me give this film 5 movie reels versus 4.5 is the fact that writer / director Pete Doctor is OBVIOUSLY a fan of science fiction and he worked three Star Wars references into Up. The two main references were during one scene where the dogs started piloting their air planes in attempt to shoot down Carl's house. When they begin to commence their attack the dogs use the lines "Red Leader, checking in," "Red Two checking in," "Red three, checking in," which as anyone should know is the opening dialogue to the Trench Run scene in A New Hope. I was the only one in the entire theater who laughed at that, but I literally fell out of my seat I was cracking up so hard. The next came at the end of the same scene when the dogs crash their planes... While they're all 3 flying in a V formation, two crash into each other while the third gets nicked and is sent spinning out into "space," which was obviously taken from the end of the Trench Run when Han comes back to clear Luke so he can fire the torpedo's into the Death Star, sending Vader's tie flying out of control. All of these references are pretty much confirmed at the end of the film when Carl and Russell have their picture taken outside of a movie theater showing Star Wars.

In the end what I really enjoyed was meaning of Up. Obviously "adventure" was a theme throughout, but with that version of adventure we think of the outdoors and big, exciting, events, but that was just the theme of the film, not the the meaning. The real message was that life is not only an adventure, life is the true adventure. Not the safaris or scuba diving trips, but the little things that make life the amazing thing that it is.

Rating: 5/5

Streaming video of the NCAA Baseball Tournament

Written by Matt on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 3:31 PM

While this isn't really normal subject matter on Automic Reviews, it does fall under "TV" (kinda). Below are links to see streaming video of select Regionals from the 2009 NCAA Tournament.

Austin Regional
Greenville Regional
Clemson Regional
Tallahassee Regional / Irvine Regional (Or other ESPNU coverage)
Fort Worth Regional
Houston Regional
Indiana Regional
Chapel Hill Regional
Norman Regional

About the author

This is the area where you will put in information about who you are, your experience blogging, and what your blog is about. You aren't limited, however, to just putting a biography. You can put whatever you please.